The controversial overturned touchdown catch by Isaiah Likely has ignited fervent discussions across the NFL, drawing attention not only from fans and analysts but also from former players. The recent clash between the Ravens and Steelers saw the Ravens fall short, primarily due to the controversial call that reversed what would have been a game-changing touchdown.
In a surprising twist, Ben Roethlisberger, the iconic former quarterback for the Steelers, weighed in on the matter, aligning himself with Ravens fans who feel cheated by the decision. His remarks suggest that he believes the call should have stood, which could also resonate deeply with Baltimore supporters.
The NFL’s explanation for the overturn came from Vice President of Instant Replay Mark Butterworth. He stated that Likely’s catch was nullified because he lacked what the league defines as a “third step,” a term that signifies a completed football action that typically indicates control. This explanation became contentious, as the timing and circumstances of the play were scrutinized by many.
Roethlisberger argued that imposing such a requirement in this particular context was unwarranted. He pointed out that Likely’s reception was made in the end zone, meaning that the traditional expectations of making further plays or gestures to maintain possession should not weigh heavily on the ruling. “Did he make a football move? No, he didn’t make a football move. I agree with that,” Roethlisberger stated during his podcast, “Footbahlin With Ben Roethlisberger.” However, he continued to emphasize that the situation dramatically changes in the end zone: “As soon as he’s in the end zone and two feet are down, he’s thinking that’s a touchdown.”
Additionally, Roethlisberger provided a hypothetical example to further clarify his point. If Likely had made the same catch at a different part of the field, he suggested, the dynamics would have likely prompted Likely to make a move toward the end zone, thus showcasing a more conventional football response. In the end zone, however, he believes the expectation shifts drastically: “He doesn’t have to make a tuck or anything because he’s in the end zone. I possessed it and I got my feet down. I don’t have to do anything else.”
Understanding the emotions involved, Roethlisberger acknowledged that Ravens fans are understandably upset with the ruling. He also reflected on how similar circumstances would provoke outrage among Steelers fans if the roles were reversed, indicating that the fervor surrounding the decision resonates on both sides.
His insights not only delve into the mechanics of catching in football but also touch on the inherent passion and bias that fans experience toward their teams. As the Ravens and their supporters grapple with the loss, Roethlisberger’s surprising support for the unfairness they perceive in the officiating may stoke further conversation on the subject as the NFL season progresses.
